Francisco Solorio v. Warden Ricolcol
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
CIVIL MINUTE S – GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-05408-FLA (SK) Date: March 13, 2025 Title Francisco Solorio v. Warden Ricolcol, et al.
Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge
Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:
None present None present
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) FINAL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
In June 2024, petitioner filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 claiming that BOP officials had been interfering with or otherwise preventing his placement in a Residential Reentry Center (RRC) to serve the rest of his custodial sentence. (ECF 1 at 7). However, because he was placed in a RRC soon after the petition’s filing, petitioner was ordered to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as moot, which he was allowed to discharge just by filing a voluntary notice of dismissal that would have resolved the petition in its entirety. (ECF 13). On March 5, 2025, petitioner filed that voluntary dismissal, as ordered. (ECF 14).