Cody

Cody v. Young

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20253:24-cv-05683California3,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GRAHAM CODY, Case No. 24-cv-05683-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND

MORRIS S. YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is the Motion, filed November 27, 2024, "to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint," brought on behalf of defendants Morris S. Young ("Young"), Gary L. Fischer ("Fischer"), David C. Chang ("Chang"), Jesse Chen ("Chen"), Christine Russell ("Russell"), Leonard J. LeBlanc ("LeBlanc") (collectively, "Individual Defendants"), and AXT, Inc. ("AXT"). Plaintiff Graham Cody ("Cody") has filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the parties' respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND The following factual allegations, contained in the "Verified Amended Shareholder Derivative Complaint"…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.