Braggs

Braggs v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20253:24-cv-00167California842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES BRAGGS, Case No.: 24-cv-00167-AJB-MSB

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION;

RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, (2) GRANTING RESPONDENT’S Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS; AND (3) CLOSING THIS CASE

(Doc. Nos. 8; 10) 18 Before the Court is Respondent Raymond Madden’s (“Respondent”) motion to dismiss Petitioner Charles Braggs’ (“Petitioner”) petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. No. 8.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule HC.2, the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). See CivLR HC.2.e.1. On February 7, 2025, Magistrate Judge Berg issued the instant R&R, recommending the Court grant Respondent’s motion and dismiss the case with prejudice. (Doc. No. 10 at 18.) Objections to the R&R were due to be filed with the Court no later than March 7, 2025 (see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.