Sohan Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
535 F. App'x 564
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201311-71025California257 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Sohan Singh and Bakhash Kaur, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA denied petitioners’ motion as untimely, and found they failed to show changed circumstances to qualify for the regulatory exception provided in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(3)(ii), where some of their evidence related in part to Singh’s prior claim, which was found not credible, and the other evidence did not establish changed circumstances in India with regard to the treatment of politically active Sikhs. Petitioners contend the BIA abused its discretion by failing to take into account country conditions evidence, by failing to consider petitioners’ evidence not tainted by the prior adverse credibility finding in conjunction with the country reports, and by discounting their credible evidence. Because these contentions are not supported by the record, petitioners have not shown the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.