Santi Fnu v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Santi, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, and review de novo the agency’s legal determinations. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Santi’s past experiences even considered cumulatively did not rise to the level of persecution. See id. at 1059 (“Persecution is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 975-76 (9th Cir.2009) (harassment, denial of medical care, arrest and detention, and mob beating did not constitute past persecution). In addition, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Santi failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution because, even under a disfavored group analysis,…