Hightower

Hightower v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20253:24-cv-01152California6,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE HIGHTOWER, et al., Case No.: 24-cv-1152-RSH-MSB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 9] 16 17 18 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendant County of San Diego (the “County”). ECF No. 9. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1) the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants the County’s motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs Clarence Hightower (“Mr. Hightower”) and Danielle Hightower (“Ms. Hightower”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint on July 3, 2024 against the County of San Diego and Does 1-30. ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges the following. // 1. Lung Surgery In May 2022, a medical scan of Mr. Hightower’s back revealed a 2-by-3-centimeter mass in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.