EP.
EP. v. Tehachapi Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E.P., a minor, by and through his guardian Case No. 1:23-cv-01724-CDB ad litem, Michel Hernandez-Disla, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF MINOR’S COMPROMISE v. (Doc. 61)
TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court is the unopposed petition of Plaintiff E.P., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Michel Hernandez-Disla (“Plaintiff”), for approval of the parties’ proposed settlement of Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c) and Local Rule 202(b). (Doc. 61). The proposed settlement will resolve Plaintiff’s federal and state law claims against the Defendants, including for violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), California’s Bane Act, and other state law claims. (Id. at 7-14). For the reasons stated below, the Court…