22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T494,UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RODOLFO GARCIA, Case No. 5:23-cv-00203-JWH (SK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT al., Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation to grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and APPROVED. 2. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for lack of administrative exhaustion. 3. Judgment DISMISSING this action without prejudice will be entered accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. eH DATED: _March 13. 2025 United States District Judge24:T4cd,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RODOLFO GARCIA, Case No. 5:23-cv-00203-JWH (SK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION TO

THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT al.,

Defendants. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation to grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and any relevant records if needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and

APPROVED.

2. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED for lack of administrative exhaustion. 3. Judgment DISMISSING this action without prejudice will be entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

eH DATED: _March 13. 2025 United States District Judge