Bollinger

Bollinger v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20251:24-cv-00303California4,751 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 MARIA BOLLINGER, et al. Case No. 1:24-cv-00303-JLT-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT STARBUCKS CORPORATION, (ECF Nos. 40, 46, 48) Defendant. THREE AND TWENTY-ONE DAY

DEADLINES

17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Maria Bollinger, Dawn Miller, and Shunda Smith (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action against Defendant Starbucks Corporation on March 12, 2024. Plaintiffs allege violations of the violation of Title III of Americans with Disabilities Act; violation of California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act; and unjust enrichment/restitution. Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ opposed motion to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 40.) Having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, as well as the Court’s record, for the reasons explained herein, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.