Interdate S.A. v. Arkose Labs, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 INTERDATE S.A., et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-02671-KAW
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
v. DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT; ORDER CONTINUING
ARKOSE LABS, INC., CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.
12 On August 26, 2024, Defendant Arkose Labs, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Interdate S.A. and BE2 SARL’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Upon review of the moving papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND In late 2021, Plaintiffs and Defendant “began preliminary discussions” regarding Plaintiffs’ interest in purchasing Defendant’s cyber security software and services.…