Crosby

Crosby v. Siordia

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20254:24-cv-07714California3,073 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT LEE CROSBY, Case No. 24-cv-07714-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE v.

SALVADOR SIORDIA, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California State Prison – Solano, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against correctional officials at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) Central, where he was previously housed. Now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s complaint. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.