Edelmira Marquez v. Eliseo Ricolcol

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20255:25-cv-00286California1,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-00286-AB (DTB) Date: March 13, 2025

Title: Edelmira Marquez v. Eliseo Ricolcol, Warden ============================================================

DOCKET ENTRY

===========================================================

PRESENT:

HON. DAVID T. BRISTOW, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Rachel Maurice n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR RESPONDENT:

None present None present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED DUE TO FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

On January 31, 2025, Petitioner Edelmira Marquez (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (“Petition”) without paying the appropriate filing fee or filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Application”). (Docket No. 1). On February 3, 2025, the Clerk issued a Notice re: Discrepancies ordering Petitioner to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.