Boparai

Boparai v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20251:24-cv-01254California1,879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BALJINDER SINGH BOPARAI, Case No. 1:24-cv-01254-KES-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS BE GRANTED 12 (Doc. 9) PAM BONDI, ET AL,1 Objections Due: 21 Days Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff, Balijinder Singh Boparai (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this complaint for 17 a writ of mandamus against: (1) “USCIS Office of the Chief Counsel;” (2) “USCIS, Asylum Office 18 San Francisco;” (3) “[Pam Bondi], United States Attorney General;” and (4) “Phillip A. Talbert” 19 (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 1 (“Compl.”) at 3–4). Plaintiff filed this action under the 20 Mandamus Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361 to compel Defendants to act on his I-589 Application for Asylum 21 (“I-589”) by scheduling his interview with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 22 (“USCIS”). Defendants now move for dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment on the 23 basis that Plaintiff lacks a clear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.