Boparai
Boparai v. Garland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BALJINDER SINGH BOPARAI, Case No. 1:24-cv-01254-KES-SKO
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS BE GRANTED 12 (Doc. 9) PAM BONDI, ET AL,1 Objections Due: 21 Days Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff, Balijinder Singh Boparai (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this complaint for 17 a writ of mandamus against: (1) “USCIS Office of the Chief Counsel;” (2) “USCIS, Asylum Office 18 San Francisco;” (3) “[Pam Bondi], United States Attorney General;” and (4) “Phillip A. Talbert” 19 (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 1 (“Compl.”) at 3–4). Plaintiff filed this action under the 20 Mandamus Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361 to compel Defendants to act on his I-589 Application for Asylum 21 (“I-589”) by scheduling his interview with the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 22 (“USCIS”). Defendants now move for dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment on the 23 basis that Plaintiff lacks a clear…