Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20255:22-cv-01427California1,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 RESH, INC, Case No. 22-cv-01427-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

BARRETT CONRAD, et al., Re: ECF No. 150 Defendants.

16 On March 11, 2025, the Court granted in part and denied in part both parties’ motions for partial summary judgment. See ECF No. 148 (“MSJ Order”). Before the Court is Plaintiff Resh, Inc.’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration regarding the Court’s ruling on obviousness. ECF No. 150. A motion for reconsideration may be made on one of three grounds: (1) a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court, which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, the party applying for reconsideration did not know at the time of the order; (2) the emergence of new material facts or a change of law; or (3) a manifest failure by the Court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.