Pace

Pace v. Omni Family Health

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20251:24-cv-01277California532 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELLEN PACE, et al., Case No.: 1:24-cv-01277-JLT-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANT

v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CLASS

OMNI FAMILY HEALTH, COUNSEL, AND APPOINTING INTERIM

CLASS COUNSEL

Defendant. (Docs. 15, 30) 16 Plaintiffs seek to hold Omni Family Health liable for violations of law related to a cyber- attack and data breach that resulted in the disclosure of personally identifiable information and protected health information of Omni Family Health’s patients. (See Doc. 1 at 2.) Plaintiffs request the appointment of Adam E. Polk of Girard Sharp LLP and M. Anderson Berry of Clayeo C. Arnold, APC as interim class counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 15.) Defendant did not oppose the motion. The magistrate judge found the factors identified under Rule 23(g)(1) weighed in favor of appointment of the proposed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.