Charanjit Bola v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
535 F. App'x 597
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201309-71300California366 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Charanjit Kaur Bola, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations cre ated by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the omission of the 2002 and 2003 police incidents from Bola’s asylum application, and her submission of the Shiromani Akali Dal letter, which contradicted her statement that she was not a member of that party. See Kohli v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1061, 1071 (9th Cir.2007) (discrepancies between testimony, declaration, and letter of membership supported adverse credibility determination); Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 973-74 (9th Cir.2011) (adverse credibility finding supported where incidents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.