Ascencion Martinez-Salas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
535 F. App'x 569
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201311-72265California323 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ascención Martinez-Salas and Jael Elizabeth Martinez-Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting Martinez-Salas’s application for suspension of deportation. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s continuous-physical-presence determination. See Vera-Villegas v. INS, 330 F.3d 1222, 1230 (9th Cir.2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision to pretermit Martinez-Salas’s application for suspension of deportation under former section 244(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (a)(2) (repealed 1996), because his receipt of an order to show cause terminated his accrual of the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States during the period immediately following his last deportable offense of overstaying his visa. See Leon-Hernandez v. INS, 926 F.2d 902, 905 (9th Cir.1991) (requiring applicants for suspension to show that they have “been physically…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.