Andres Tamberg v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201311-71294California382 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 31 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRES TAMBERG; MUREL No. 11-71294

MURAKAS,

Agency Nos. A072-563-895 Petitioners, A072-404-391

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 24, 2013 **

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Andres Tamberg and Murel Murakas, natives of the former Soviet Union

and citizens of Estonia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction

is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.