Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Ooma, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20255:24-cv-02527California3,352 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 ESTECH SYSTEMS IP, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-02527-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v.

OOMA, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 24 Defendants.

16 In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff Estech Systems IP, LLC accuses Defendant Ooma, Inc. of infringing three patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,391,298 (the “’298 Patent”), 7,068,684 (the “’684 Patent”), and 7,123,699 (the “’699 Patent”) (together, the “Asserted Patents”), directed to systems and methods for providing communications systems, including voice over IP (“VoIP”) telephony. Ooma moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). ECF No. 24. After carefully reviewing the documents, the Court found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Ooma’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND Estech, a Texas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.