Doerer

(PC) Justus v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20251:25-cv-00138California689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ROBERT JUSTUS, No. 1:25-cv-00138-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING MOTION TO CREATE A

v. CLASS ACTION BE DENIED J. DOERER, et al., (ECF No. 9)

Defendants.

11 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to create a class certification, filed March 12, 2025. Plaintiff submits that “there are at least 27 Plaintiffs that filed substantially the same claims in this Court and the class extends to approximately one thousand people.” (ECF No. 9.) I. DISCUSSION Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) governors whether a case can proceed as a class action. The prerequisites to maintenance of a class action are that (1) the class is so numerous 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.