Simpson

Simpson v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20253:21-cv-01763California3,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTE JAMAL SIMPSON, Case No.: 21cv1763-CAB-JLB

Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 42],

OVERRULING OBJECTIONS,

MOORE, et al,

DENYING AMENDED PETITION,

Respondent. AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

17 Dionte Jamal Simpson (“Petitioner”), is a state prisoner proceeding (with counsel) 18 with an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. [Doc. No. 30.] This matter was referred to United States 20 Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate 21 Judge Burkhardt issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending the 22 Court deny the petition. [Doc. No. 42.] Petitioner filed objections to the Report. [Doc. 23 No. 43.] 24 Following de novo review of Petitioner’s claims, the Court finds the Report to be 25 thorough, complete, and an accurate analysis of the legal issues presented in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.