Allen

(PC) Rodgers-Castillo v. Allen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20251:25-cv-00304California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILTON RODGERS-CASTILLO, et al. Case No. 1:25-cv-00304-BAM (PC) Plaintiffs, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF MANUEL

RODGERS-CASTILLO TO SUBMIT

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

ALLEN, et al.,

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Milton Rodgers-Castillo and Manuel Rodgers-Castillo (“Plaintiffs”) are state prisoners proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs initiated this joint action on March 12, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff Milton Rodgers-Castillo submitted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on March 13, 2025. (ECF Nos. 2, 8.) Plaintiff Manuel Rodgers-Castillo has not yet submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or paid the $405.00 filing fee for this action. In a recent decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires each prisoner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.