C S Bio Co. v. Comerica Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20253:22-cv-05033California1,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 C S BIO CO., et al., Case No. 22-cv-0503 3-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SEEK

COMERICA BANK, RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO AMEND Defendant.

15 Plaintiffs move for leave to seek reconsideration of a prior order dismissing part of the operative second amended complaint, and for leave to file a third amended complaint that would reinstate the previously dismissed claims as well as add certain allegations that plaintiffs contend are new. Both motions will be denied.1 20 1. Leave to seek reconsideration The second amended complaint included four separately numbered claims for relief, all sounding in fraud. The first claim, labeled “Fraud — Intentional Misrepresentation” alleged two distinct sets of misrepresentations. The first set, catalogued in paragraph 74(a) of the second

26 1 Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.