Woo

Woo v. United Express Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20252:22-cv-01253California1,874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMBER WOO, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-1253-DAD-JDP Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED EXPRESS GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs move for default judgment against defendants People Movers California, Long Distance Moving Experts, and Satellite Logistics. ECF No. 41. For the reasons set forth below, I recommend that plaintiffs’ motion be denied without prejudice.1 I. Background According to the first amended complaint, defendant Nicolae Gutu is the owner and alter ego of defendants People Movers California, Inc. (“PMCA”), Long Distance Moving Experts, Inc. (“LDME”), and Satellite Logistics, Inc. (“Sat Log”). ECF No. 26 ¶ 9. PMCA, LDME, and Sat Log are corporations doing business as “People Movers.” Id. ¶¶ 6-8. All three are licensed as

1 Defendant Nicolae Gutu, proceeding without counsel, filed a motion to continue the 26 hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. ECF No. 46. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.