Estrada

Estrada v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20253:25-cv-00783California1,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO ESTRADA,

Case No. 25-cv-00783-SK Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND 9 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Regarding Docket Nos. 10 Defendant.

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiff’s motion to remand. The Court finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the hearing scheduled for March 24, 2025. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for the reasons set forth below. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action in state court asserting claims under the Song-Beverly Act, California Civil Code §§ 1790 et seq., based on alleged defects to his vehicle that he purchased from Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”). Nissan removed this case based on diversity 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.