(PC) Doss v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20252:24-cv-01092California3,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT L. DOSS, No. 2:24-cv-1092 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is before the Court. (ECF No. 12.) As set forth below, plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is dismissed with leave to amend. I. SCREENING STANDARDS The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). A claim is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.