Pesce
(PS) Wu v. Pesce
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ICHI WU, Case No. 2:25-cv-0760-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JAMIE PESCE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff brings this action against Judge Jamie Pesce; District Attorney Vern R. Pierson; Public Defenders Joshua Stillnian, Sarah Reimche, Kathryn Schulz, and Abigail Rosemon; plaintiff’s former employer, Emig Max Ordonez; and Margorie, Ordonez’s niece. Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully convicted of resisting arrest and evicted from his home. This court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims, and so the complaint should be dismissed without leave to amend. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state…