Dizon

Dizon v. Alegre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20251:23-cv-01366California1,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILLI DIZON and MARK JASON Case No. 1:23-cv-01366-JLT-BAM

ESPEJO,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX Plaintiffs, PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER v. (Doc. 44) AMOR ALEGRE and AURORA RIGON, 15 Defendants. 16 BACKGROUND On March 14, 2025, Plaintiffs Sheilli Dizon and Mark Jason Espejo (“Plaintiffs”) filed an ex parte application to modify the Scheduling Conference Order. (Doc. 44.) Plaintiffs request that the Court extend the non-expert and expert discovery deadlines by at least ninety (90) days. (Id.) Plaintiffs explain that the request is based on the inability to complete fact discovery prior to expiration of the non-expert discovery deadline and due to the impending expert disclosure deadline. Plaintiffs report that, among other things, Defendants failed to make initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.