White
White v. Capital One
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOLORES WHITE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00633-SKO
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING DENYING
IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART
v. D DE ISF MEN ISD SA NT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO 12 CAPITAL ONE, N.A., et al., (Doc. 35) 13 Defendants. _____________________________________/ I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is Defendants Capital One, N.A. and Mary Dickins1 (“Defendants”)’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Verified First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”), seeking to dismiss Plaintiff Dolores White (“Plaintiff”)’s first, second, fourth, seventh, and eighth causes of action as insufficiently pled pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and nineteenth cause of action as procedurally defective pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). (Doc. 17). On December 17, 2025, Plaintiff filed her opposition, (Doc. 18), and Defendants filed their reply on December 27, 2027, (Doc. 24). The Court has reviewed the parties’…