Macomber

(PC) Travers v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20251:25-cv-00033California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID M. TRAVERS, Case No. 1:25-cv-0033 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

J. MACOMBER, et al., (Doc. 11) Defendants.

16 David Travers seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights and Proposition 57 while housed at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility in Corcoran. (See generally Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 11 at 3-7.) In addition, the magistrate judge determined leave to amend would be futile “[b]ecause Plaintiff cannot state a claim as a matter of law.” (Id. at 7.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss the action “for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” (Id.) The Court served the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.