(PC) Foust v. California Medical Facility
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL FOUST, No. 2:21-CV-0540-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al.,1 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 21, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a fourth amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. / / / / / / / / / 27 Pursuant to the Court’s recent orders, this action proceeds against Defendants Aqualian and Kahlon. See ECF Nos. 105 and 106. ] The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 2 || See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S.…