Aung

(PC) Niles v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20252:22-cv-01832California7,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DONNELL NILES, No. 2:22-cv-1832 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SANDAR AUNG, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court are plaintiff’s motion to compel and for additional discovery (ECF No. 32) and defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34). I. Procedural Background Upon screening the complaint, the court found that plaintiff stated a claim for deliberate indifference against defendant Aung but failed to state an equal protection claim. ECF No. 7. Instead of amending the complaint, plaintiff elected to voluntarily dismiss the equal protection claim against Aung and proceed on his deliberate indifference claim only. ECF No. 10. After Aung answered the complaint, the undersigned set a schedule for discovery in this case which provided that written requests for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.