Stratton

Stratton v. Oroville City Elementary School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20252:23-cv-00964California10,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BROCK STRATTON, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, No. 2:23-cv-00964-TLN-CSK

13 v. ORDER

OROVILLE CITY ELEMENTARY

15 SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Elizabeth Mgbam’s (“Mgbam”) Motion to Dismiss and Defendants Oroville City Elementary School District (“District”), Kimberly Tyler (“Tyler”), John Bettencourt (“Bettencourt”), and Spencer Holtom’s (“Holtom”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF Nos. 34, 35.) Both motions are fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 36, 38, 45, 46.) As described below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Mgbam’s Motion and the District, Tyler, Bettencourt, and Holtom’s (collectively “District and Officials”) Motion.

26 27 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND C.S., a child with autism spectrum disorder, previously attended Oakdale Heights Elementary School. (ECF No. 30 ¶ 12.) C.S. had a Behavior Intervention Plan (“BIP”) which detailed specific…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.