Espina

Espina v. Department of Veterans Affairs, West Consolidated Patient Account Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20252:23-cv-02539California921 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ANG ESPINA, No. 2:23-cv-02539-JAM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

v. AGREEMENT DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN

AFFAIRS, WEST CONSOLIDATED

PATIENT ACCOUNT CENTER; and

DOES 1 THROUGH 100,

inclusive, Defendants. 18 Before the Court is Department of Veteran Affair’s (“the Department”) motion to enforce the settlement agreement. See Mot., ECF No. 31. Raul Ang Espina (“Plaintiff”) does not oppose the Department’s motion. See Statement of Non-Opposition, ECF No. 33. For the following reasons, the Department’s motion is GRANTED.1 ///

1This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for March 25, 2025. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a lawsuit bringing claims as to his admonishment for poor work performance. See Compl., ECF No. 1; 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.