Olfati

Olfati v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20252:23-cv-02547California639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PARVIN OLFATI, Case No. 2:23-cv-2547-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Parvin Olfati filed a civil rights complaint against the City of Sacramento, various Sacramento police officers, and several of plaintiff’s neighbors, alleging violations of her First and Fourth Amendment rights. Before the court ruled on defendant O’Brien’s, defendant Maviglio’s, and defendants Andres and Taylor’s separate motions to dismiss, O’Brien filed a motion for sanction, and plaintiff filed two motions for sanctions against O’Brien. In light of the court’s recent order denying the motions to dismiss without prejudice, and plaintiff’s filing of an amended complaint, the pending motions for sanctions are denied. Under Rule 11, sanctions may be imposed “when a filing is frivolous, legally unreasonable, or without factual foundation, or is brought for an improper purpose.” Estate of Blue v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.