(PC) Sanchez v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20252:24-cv-02737California935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO SANCHEZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-2737-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants. 16 On October 18, 2024, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it did not state a claim. ECF No. 5. I ordered him to file, within thirty days, an amended complaint. Id. On December 12, 2024, I granted plaintiff’s request for an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint or otherwise to respond to the court order. Therefore, on February 14, 2025, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 11. I notified plaintiff that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the February 14, 2025…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.