Dylan

(PC) Foster v. Dylan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20252:25-cv-00456California1,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 25-cv-00456 WBS SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DYLAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 9.) Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is also before the court for screening under 42 U.S.C. § 1915A. (ECF No. 5.) For the reasons described below, the undersigned orders plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within thirty days of this order. STATUTORY SCREENING OF PRISONER COMPLAINTS The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.