Longoria

(PC) Duran v. Longoria

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20251:20-cv-00289California5,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD DURAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00289-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

v.

(Doc. No. 73)

LONGORIA, Defendant. 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Longoria’s motion for summary judgment, filed on December 23, 2024. (Doc. No. 73, “MSJ”). Plaintiff Paul Edward Duran, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, timely filed an opposition, (Doc. No. 76), and Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. No. 78). The Court finds no dispute as to any material fact that Defendant’s confiscation of Plaintiff’s religious items did not substantially burden Plaintiff’s religious practices in violation of the Free Exercise Clause. Therefore, the Court grants Defendant’s motion. /// /// 27 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 55). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.