Moten

Moten v. Eastern District Courthouse of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20251:24-cv-01387California515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 SHARROD MOTEN, No. 1:24-cv-01387-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

EASTERN DISTRICT COURTHOUSE OF

CALIFORNIA, et al., Docs. 3, 7,

Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

16 On November 13, 2024, plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Eastern District Courthouse of California, Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, Judge Gary S. Austin, Judge Christopher D. Baker, Judge Sheri Pym, Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, Judge Jennifer L. Thurston, and Judge David O. Carter. Doc. 1. On February 10, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and directing plaintiff to pay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.