(HC) Prado v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20251:25-cv-00319California1,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEJANDRO PRADO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00319-SKO (HC)

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR

v. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

S. WILLIAMS, Warden, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondent. [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE]

17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He filed the instant petition on March 17, 2025, challenging his 1999 convictions in Tulare County Superior Court. (Doc. 1.) Because the petition is successive and fails to state a claim, the Court will recommend it be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must dismiss a petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.