Sare

Sare v. Shad CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2013C069573California5,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/31/13 Sare v. Shad CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

CAROLE MARIE SARE, as Representative, etc.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C069573

v. (Super. Ct. No. SC20090115)

ANTONIA SHAD et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

In this appeal, we consider whether a decedent attorney’s estate may recover a contingency fee even though the attorney died before the legal services were completed by associated counsel. The decedent attorney, Dale Sare, agreed to represent sisters Antonia Shad and Mary Tsouris in matters relating to the conservatorship and eventual probate of the estate belonging to their half brother, Dan Mathisen. Under the contract for legal services, Sare was entitled to a third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.