Asbell

Asbell v. Hamon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202523-1801California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY ASBELL, No. 23-1801 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:22-cv-00045-DCN v.

MEMORANDUM*

AUTOM HAMON; TONYA

McMILLAN; PATRICK JONES; MR.

WEST; CORIZON; CENTURION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Idaho state prisoner Anthony Asbell appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law claims arising

from the failure to provide adequate medical supplies. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.