P.

P. v. Lucero CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2013G046841California3,353 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/31/13 P. v. Lucero CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G046841

v. (Super. Ct. No. 10CF2760)

ERNESTO LUCERO, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Lance Jensen, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Siri Shetty, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, A. Natasha Cortina and Kelley Johnson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Ernesto Lucero was found guilty of attempted murder, carjacking, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.