Westin

Westin v. City of Calabasas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202523-3729California478 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE WESTIN, No. 23-3729 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-03788-VBF-DFM Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF CALABASAS; CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT; CALIFORNIA

COURT OF APPEALS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Bruce Westin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth

Amendments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Seismic Reservoir 2020, Inc. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.