Bondi

Vega Lorente v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202524-3215California313 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SABASTIAN VEGA LORENTE, No. 24-3215 Agency No. Petitioner, A022-392-553 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge

Submitted March 17, 2025 **

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Sabastian Vega Lorente, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions pro se

for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) order affirming an asylum officer’s

negative reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence an IJ’s negative reasonable fear

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). determination. Orozco-Lopez v. Garland, 11 F.4th 764, 774 (9th Cir. 2021). We

deny the petition for review.

Substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.