United States v. Johnson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202524-3923California301 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3919 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00011-SPG-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3923 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:23-cr-00012-SPG-1 v.

ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Eric Lamont Johnson appeals from the district

court’s judgments and challenges the 14-month concurrent sentences imposed

upon revocation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.