McGranahan

McGranahan v. Geico Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 20, 202524-1037California2,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL MCGRANAHAN, No. 24-1037 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:22-cv-00125-FLA-kk v.

MEMORANDUM*

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY, DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 15, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge FRIEDLAND.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Plaintiff-Appellant Michael McGranahan appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for Defendant-Appellee GEICO Indemnity Co. (“Geico”) in a

suit asserting breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

grant of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.