McGee
McGee v. Milpitas Police Department
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 20 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY McGEE, No. 23-3670 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-02559-VKD Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MILPITAS POLICE DEPARTMENT;
CITY OF MILPITAS; OFFICER DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Virginia Kay DeMarchi, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted March 17, 2025***
Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Anthony McGee appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the Fourth
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…