In re Alex S. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2013F065679California3,426 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

The Robbery and its Aftermath On the morning of April 30, 2012 (April 30), the following persons were traveling on a bus in Fresno: Fifteen-year-old B.R., who was on her way to school; her female cousin, S.G.; a boy (victim) who was listening with headphones to an iPad; a boy known to B.R. as Mervin; and another boy who appeared to be a friend of Mervin’s. At approximately 7:30 a.m., the bus stopped near the corner of Cedar and Clinton, and these

Except as otherwise indicated, all statutory references are to the Penal Code. Appellant was initially adjudged a ward of the court in 2009, based on his adjudication of bringing or possessing a weapon on school grounds (§ 626.10, subd. (a)). He was readjudged a ward the first time in 2010, for violating curfew and obey-all-law conditions of probation; a second time later in 2010, for committing a violation of section 288, subdivision (a) (committing a lewd or lascivious act against a child under the age of 14), and a third time in 2012, for committing a violation of section 21310 (carrying a concealed dirk or dagger).

2 five persons got off the bus. As the victim was walking near the bus stop, Mervin and his friend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.