Glaski

Glaski v. Bank of America CA5

Bad Law
160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 449·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 633·218 Cal. App. 4th 1079·2013 WL 4037310
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2013F064556California8,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Franson, J.

INTRODUCTION

Before Washington Mutual Bank, FA (WaMu), was seized by federal banking regulators in 2008, it made many residential real estate loans and used those loans as collateral for mortgage-backed securities. Many of the loans went into default, which led to nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings. Some of the foreclosures generated lawsuits, which raised a wide variety of claims. The allegations that the instant case shares with some of the other lawsuits are that (1) documents related to the foreclosure contained forged signatures of Deborah Brignac and (2) the foreclosing entity was not the true owner of the loan because its chain of ownership had been broken by a defective transfer of the loan to the securitized trust established for the mortgage-backed securities. Here, the specific defect alleged is that the attempted transfers were made after the closing date of the securitized trust holding the pooled mortgages and therefore the transfers were ineffective.

In this appeal, the borrower contends the trial court erred by sustaining defendants’ demurrer as to all of his causes of action attacking the nonjudicial foreclosure. We conclude that, although the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.